• about me
  • about klog
  • taglines

kringle leaves our gifts

Home › topics › rob

(note to rob: this is not to say I wouldn't totally dig a cashmere scarf)

kelly  |  4 January 2006 - 1:14am

One of my dearest friends has just fallen in love. Her life right now is filled with the romance of a love fresh and new, a whirlwind of pink roses and champagne and just-because gifts like a cashmere scarf.

Last night while we were making stuffed shells for dinner, Rob commented that this dish always turns out a bit bland. He wondered what we could add to spice it up a bit. And I was slightly taken aback (and okay, slightly defensive) because I had never found our shells to be bland. And he was the one who suggested we have this for dinner and why the hell did he even suggest it if he felt they were too bland? If he didn't even like the damn shells? And of course I said as much to him and he shot me the Sheesh, woman look as he reached for the basil. And as I tried to regain perspective I realized that while he was just talking about the shells, I had transposed his comments to more than just dinner. The champagne bubbles of my friend's love life were going straight to my head.

Established couples often lament the loss of romance. It makes sense, I guess, that with the day in and day out, the zsa zsa zsu fades a bit. That with the laundry and the lawn mowing, a little of the lust is lost.

But Rob and I never had it to lose. Not romance in the traditional sense, anyway. When we met, we were too young for champagne, too cheap for cashmere, and I'm not sure he ever gave me roses. Maybe once. Perhaps his most romantic gesture in those first few months was letting me wear his hat to class. Which, take it from me, is a surefire way to sweep a smitten teenage girl right off her feet. Sure, there was lust - we were high schoolers with hormones, after all. But mostly we were innocent. I remember us getting tipsy on wine one time when his parents weren't home and rolling down the hill outside his house. Over and over and over, laughing until our bellies ached. There was an innocence, and a romance, in being content to just be together.

Last night after dinner we sat around for over an hour, catching up on several issues of Reader's Digest. Rob always reads the jokes to me. Maybe we really are as boring as the stuffed shells, I thought. But soon we were laughing hysterically (more so at the really bad jokes than the good ones and probably even more so at each other) and it occurred to me that this was actually a really nice way to spend the evening. And I thought about how I had teasingly flipped him off during dinner and he had said, "I'm not sure if I should be delighted or concerned that we often flip each other off in this relationship" and I had grinned and said, "Definitely delighted." And I thought about how, while making dinner, we'll sometimes slow dance in the kitchen. And I realized that for us the romance is still in being content to just be together.

I figure when we're 80, we'll still be reading Reader's Digest (large print edition) to each other, we'll still be flipping the bird at each other, we'll still be slow dancing in the kitchen. Hell, we'll probably still be bickering over the stuffed shells recipe. And maybe some people would find that bland. But I think it's incredibly romantic.

  • rob
  • 735 reads
 

Nilbo  |  4 January 2006 - 2:17am

Awwww. Just awwwww.

See, friggin' John Stamos probably wouldn't even GET the Reader's Digest thing. He'd probably say "What? "Well, if I'd known you were French I'd have worn galoshes!"??? What kind of a crappy punch line is that? Damn, I hate "Humor in Uniform"!" And you'd be all "It's funny because it's so stupid." and he'd be all "Well, Bob Saget never told bad jokes like this." and you'd be all "You just don't get it." and he'd be all "There's nothing to get." and you'd be all "No, not the joke. I'm not even talking about the joke here. I'm talking about "it". You don't get it. You don't get ME." And he'd be all "Whatever. I'm pretty, I don't have to be smart." and you'd be all "OK, point taken, but still."

And see? That's just not as good as laughing at Reader's Digest together.

 

mrtl  |  4 January 2006 - 3:34am

I'm flipping you off, and taking my comment to my own blog. So there.

 

Bente  |  4 January 2006 - 4:03am

That doesn't sound bland to me at all. You guys really are a great couple.

 

william  |  4 January 2006 - 9:15am

My parent's are in their 60's, married 42 years, and they still flip each other off. They say it is their way of telling the other they are still Number 1. They just choose to use the middle finger instead of the pointer.

 

Andrea  |  4 January 2006 - 9:20am

OK, William's comment is totally cracking me up. And Kelly? Word.

That is all.

 

yonz  |  4 January 2006 - 9:25am

You've got to love William's parents and that big ol' brood of theirs.

Okay, KSta. Stop with the gushiness already - before you make me subscribe to Reader's Digest and start making stuffed shells in hopes of sparking up the marriage kindling.

 

lawbrat  |  4 January 2006 - 10:23am

Ok, yea. I love readers digest. That is not bland at all. What you two have is special. How many people can say they got drunk and rolled down a hill repetedly with their hubby?

 

Susie  |  4 January 2006 - 10:51am

I love your marriage. (I love mine, too.)

Oh, and to spice things up: sometimes we put in some chopped steamed shrimp (Old Bay, of course) and crabmeat. I'm talking stuffed shells, now, you understand.

 

LadyBug  |  4 January 2006 - 11:27am

It IS incredibly romantic.

That was a beautiful post, Kelly. Just lovely.

And this sentence...

"That with the laundry and the lawn mowing, a little of the lust is lost."

...is so poetic. I'm totally digging the alliteration there.

HUGS to you and your sweetie, dear.

 

RazDreams  |  4 January 2006 - 12:37pm

dang! see, i waited, and look what happened: ladybug done stole my line! ;) i totally wanted to log on here and say, "Great story. And I'm totally loving the alliteration," but then i saw ladybug wrote it, and it's so clever of her, that now i'm not going to write it at all. ;) i'm just going to say that great minds really do think alike! smoooches, kelly and rob.

 

michael  |  4 January 2006 - 2:20pm

Let's say you just moved to a new city. In the beginning, you're going to go to a lot of different restaurants. You'll try lots of dishes you've never had before. It will be exciting and fun - the thrill of the unexpected.

Over time, though, the pattern will change. You'll stop visiting some of the restaurants. Sometimes, you'll order something you've already had that you loved, instead of trying something new. You'll still try new things, but the longer you live in the city, the more you'll want to go to a particular restaurant, and get a dish you already know. You'll remember a fun time you had at that place, eating that food, and it'll bring back those times for you.

Eventually, a whole lifetime of experiences is attached to that one restaurant, that one dish. And that makes a difference - even though you've had it a million times, it's still a richer experience for you than trying something new. The fact that you've done it so many times before is like adding extra spice to that dish.

That's how relationships are. The fact that you've both been there for so long, together, adds the spice to everyday things. A simple conversation (or hand gesture) is made richer by your shared experiences, and it's the being together that makes the whole thing so amazing. It just keeps getting better.

 

jessica_deva  |  4 January 2006 - 2:30pm

I think you have a lovely relationship and if you can write an entry like "Decade-long Crush" I think you two are doing better than fine. And it's always nice to read about - I find it very inspiring.

 

Von Krankipantzen  |  4 January 2006 - 4:36pm

*sniff* Being single and all I only hope I get to experience some of what you have written here. Your relationship sounds wonderful.

 

cat  |  4 January 2006 - 5:36pm

Oh, the romance. Oh, the PRETTY. You guys make me want to VOMIT. But in the good way! With the too much cuteness?

My dad absolutely loves Reader's Digest jokes. He memorizes Laughter: The Best Medicine monthly, and calls and attempts to pass the jokes off as his own. I haven't the heart to tell him I already read them in my own copy, which we have been getting for years (TGIM is a fan). Silly Daddy.

 

momo  |  4 January 2006 - 11:12pm

Yours is a beautiful love story, and you tell it soooooooo well!

 

Amy  |  5 January 2006 - 11:14pm

Sounds like a perfectly lovely way to spend the evening to me. And I love the rolling down the hill thing. You guys. I think you got it.

 
 syndicate all commentsall comments

Navigation

  • topics
    • bitch sessions
    • bliss bits
    • bookshelf
    • dear diary
    • felines
    • friends
    • google goddess
    • lessons learned
    • lists
    • memes
    • meta-blogging
    • moments
    • motley
    • obsessions
    • oh to be a woman
    • random thoughts
    • recipes
    • redneck valley
    • resonating
    • rob
      • guest posts
      • things I love about you
    • tales
    • travel journal
    • universe is against me
    • watercooler wannabe
  • archives
  • image gallery
  • search

Recent blog posts

  • baby's first fashion statement
  • making pasta
  • creating space
  • blizzard outside
  • keep calm and carry on
  • peppermint marshmallows, or cuten up your cocoa
  • two weeks into 2010
  • G.K. Chesterton
  • random shit for which I'm thankful, 2009
  • hiking to the fire tower
more

photoblog

juxtapose daily photo

backlog: one year ago

  • the quitter knitter and a darn good yarn
  • rainy weekend
  • not quitting my day job

been reading

  • People of the Book
  • When You Are Engulfed in Flames
  • Home Cooking
  • Bird by Bird
  • My Life in France

Archives

« March 2010 »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031
 
  • about me
  • about klog
  • taglines

© 2005-2010 Kelly L.